So, last post I introduced Michael Moynagh’s argument that mission is a task for the Christian community, not individuals alone, and the need to recognise that ‘church’ can be any Christian community in any context – not just Sunday gatherings in residential areas. This post I want to offer a response….
I couldn’t agree more that the Christian community is essential for mission. I think Hauerwas is spot on that it is in this community that we learn what it is to be Christian, that we learn the language, actions and perspective that shapes us to live faithful to God. I think Newbigin is totally right that the gospel will only look credible today when people can see a community who are actually living it out. We can shout opinions all we want, but if we can’t point to a community of people actually living as if those opinions are true then they’re seen to be empty and hollow.
A couple of minor points I’d like to tweak a bit….
For example, Moynagh argues that, although Hauerwas recognises the problem of Christians being isolated in most of their lives by suggesting we should be sent out in pairs, he doesn’t go far enough to see the missional role of community because he is stuck with an assumption of church as the Sunday gathering in residential areas. Maybe, maybe not. I would argue (indeed, I have argued in an MPhil where I also strongly stated the missional role of community), that Hauerwas’ thought includes a concept of improvisation (thanks Sam Wells for the terminology). Part of our character being formed to speak, see and think faithful to Jesus, is that we find new ways of expressing that faithfulness in new contexts. Thus, new forms of church are not excluded by Hauerwas, they’re arguably a natural progression of his thought…..we should see them emerging!
But that is a minor point…..here are two more significant comments….
1) We are never going to avoid being sent out alone…..from any community. Moynagh is so right that we need to encourage Christian communities to form in different spheres of life. But that doesn’t mean we will all be able to have a community in every sphere of our lives. For one thing, real community requires a level of commitment that simply can’t be spread amongst a work church, gym church, neighbourhood church and pub church…..we’ll form loose networks not real community. That means we are going to find ourselves sent out from our community at some point…..and I think that’s ok…..
2) …more than ok, I think it may be necessary. Another unease I felt was the underlying assumption that we all have very different spheres to our lives that are distinct to one another. The assumption that I need a church at work as well as in my neighbourhood because these are two distinct spheres of life that have little contact with one another. Now, that may in some ways be true, but one of the concerns I have about contemporary society is our willingness to compartmentalise our lives as if how I am in one place has no bearing on how I am elsewhere. I may lie at work because that’s what you do there, but I won’t lie ‘in church’ because it’s not right……and I’m cool with that. I wonder if the church should be a community that challenges the assumption we can compartmentalise our lives, rather than seeking to provide an alternative community in every compartment of it…..
So these two points lead me to end with this thought: does it make a difference if we see our mission as to form disciples rather than to plant churches? (Neil Cole of the Organic Church movement argues this….it’s not a Sam original!) Is the greatest need not for Christian communities in every sphere of every individuals’ life, but for Christian communities that form disciples who see their life as a whole and live faithful in every part of life?
The church is not simply a community to which I belong, it is a something of which I am a part – we are the church. And we are the church everywhere we go. Wherever and however often I gather with the rest of the community, I will always be the church in every part of my life….there is never a time when I am ‘isolated’ from that community, when the church is no longer with me or relevant to me. That is not to say I won’t feel ‘isolated’ and there are certainly ways for Christian communities to improve in supporting one another when we’re not gathered together, but we remain part of that community whether we are physically together or not.
This is a thought that may require more space to get more clarity! I’d value your thoughts….I’m still thinking this through. In any event, I strongly recommend having a read of Moynagh’s book – it’ll get you thinking and give you some ideas!